Well yes! This is the answer that you should have the courage to give all those who claim to transform chess into a mass phenomenon, even when, as is clear in Italy, there are no conditions. It 'is worth repeating, we chess have always been a minority phenomenon, typical of an upper-middle-class cultural and soft grain Enlightenment: nothing to do with the roots spread in the countries of Eastern Europe, where the board was an unavoidable presence even in the trousseau of the young wives, and nothing to do with the contagious passion of Latin American circles, seaports dense smoke and humanity of uncertain provenienza.E what about the British and Central European tradition, the great circuit prim clubs and tournaments where the rich European intelligentsia and wealthy businessmen vied to host the great players of the time, serious professional and impeccable, but especially true champions and virtuous the board?
No, we did not have anything like this and if there is any politician who insists on defining a chess game left, probably because he saw that the Russian Slavs in general are very strong since the Berlin Wall it is not surprising that much, since there is probably at least 40% of its voters who feel the same way.
So what? And then you should take note of what is the reality of things, namely that it will take many years because chess in Italy also assume a dimension that reflects the real cultural importance and indeed the whole movement to return her dignity, since our national chess environment, in contrast to what happens abroad, did not bother to maintain an image of dignity and credibility, but he did everything to screditarsi.Se someone asks what I'm referring explicitly : summer tournaments that seem to camps of displaced persons (due to the state of general sloppiness of the participants), police associations, referees incapable anyone out of the way to serene live or recommendation, and players who are buying and selling the lots in a more or less shameless and no one will find nothing to say, because in fact, according to common opinion, they are not to damage the movement, but rather those who take the bother to report things that do not go. According to the most, in fact, it's much better to shut up, turn a blind eye and try to make chess a beautiful mass sports, from kids how to practice volleyball, swimming, or basketball (football is obviously unattainable) ... but I say: it would be appropriate to have some 'healthy realism? Yes, because if the 'environment exerts its influence, positive or negative, then we think that their environment with so many problems such as chess will unfortunately a disservice to kids who try to enter it with the guides wrong! It is no secret, in fact, the presence of a nice bunch of "border line of inquiry" that haunt the clubs, usually motivated by something that is not named nor passion for chess, no vocation for teaching, but simply a desire to bring tax on four planks: they, who harbor the secret hope that we can generally get by teaching chess to young audiences bewildered and indifferent, may be the true "pasaran" massification "of the movement of chess, which brought with him the culture of wild membership players "Under 16" (even if it is a membership often forced and not always tied to a constant chess practice) and especially the unfortunate habit of focussing on the competitive aspect to the educational.
short, if you got it, it's no surprise that many young men, often showing more common sense of their parents, drop courses simply to play chess on the Internet.
would therefore be advisable for someone to realize that to become truly mass movement must recover a dignity and decorum that, for now, can only be achieved in one way, namely by removing the corruption at all levels, by the arbitrators who decide to helium the player or the club membership (the "strong" are always right), players are incorrect, bogus by master instructors, "barkers" chess we return to the environment quality, clarity and reliability, even at the cost of being in the near future meno.Del someone else, we are sure you amass rewards cards is the policy? We're sure to be seen and appreciated at the level of civil society is necessary to make collection of charlatans and "fancazzisti landing"? I think not, indeed, you need the exact opposite and give priority to quality, expect an environment where they have a sense of values \u200b\u200bsuch as respect for others and good manners and above all to rediscover the sense of this ancient game that is not an art, not a science, and especially not a sport.Gli chess, in fact, are essentially a "discipline" and aoolutamente content-rich and food for thought for a path of individual research and group that can not blindly be exhausted in a course on the final tower, or on opening theory.
Pauca SED BONI, therefore, and without nostalgia for the mob and armed zavorra.Le brancaleone, you know, not going anywhere ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment